ObamaCare and Me

Posted: August 29, 2009 in National Health Care
Tags: , ,

This letter was originally published on www.americanthinker.com and is written by Dr. Zane F. Pollard.
This is a must read for anyone! If you know a doctor that would like to make thier concerns public about ObamaCare and government run health care please have them contact me, I would be happy to give them the space on this blog!

I have been sitting quietly on the sidelines watching all of this national debate on healthcare. It is time for me to bring some clarity to the table by explaining many of the problems from the perspective of a doctor.

 

 

First off, the government has involved very few of us physicians in the  healthcare debate. While the American Medical Association has come out in favor of the plan, it is vital to remember that the AMA only represents 17% of the American physician workforce.

 

I have taken care of Medicaid patients for 35 years while representing the only pediatric ophthalmology group left in Atlanta, Georgia that accepts Medicaid. For example, in the past 6 months I have cared for three young children on Medicaid who had corneal ulcers. This is a potentially blinding situation because if the cornea perforates from the infection, almost surely blindness will occur. In all three cases the antibiotic needed for the eradication of the infection was not on the approved Medicaid list.

 

Each time I was told to fax Medicaid for the approval forms, which I did. Within 48 hours the form came back to me which was sent in immediately via fax, and I was told that I would have my answer in 10 days. Of course by then each child would have been blind in the eye.

 

Each time the request came back denied. All three times I personally provided the antibiotic for  each patient which was not on the Medicaid approved  list. Get the point — rationing of care.

 

Over the past 35 years I have cared for over 1000 children born with congenital cataracts. In older children and in adults the vision is rehabilitated with an intraocular lens. In newborns we use contact lenses which are very expensive. It takes Medicaid over one year to approve a contact lens post  cataract surgery. By that time a successful anatomical operation is wasted as the child will be close to blind from a lack of focusing for so long a period of time.

 

Again, extreme rationing. Solution: I have a foundation here in Atlanta supported  100% by private funds which supplies all of these contact lenses for  my Medicaid and illegal immigrants children for free. Again, waiting for the government would be disastrous.

 

Last week I  had a lady bring her child to me. They are Americans but live in Sweden, as the father has a job with a big corporation. The child had the onset of double vision 3 months ago and has been unable to function normally because of this. They are people of means but are waiting 8 months to see the ophthalmologist in Sweden. Then if the child needed surgery they would be put on a 6 month waiting list. She called me and I saw her that day. It turned out that  the child had  accommodative esotropia (crossing of the eyes treated with glasses that  correct for farsightedness) and  responded to glasses within  4 days, so no surgery was needed. Again, rationing of care.

 

Last month I operated on a 70 year old lady with double vision present for 3  years. She responded quite nicely to her surgery and now is symptom free. I also operated on a 69 year old  judge with vertical double vision. His surgery went very well and now he is happy as a lark.  I have  been told — but of course  there is no healthcare bill that has been passed yet — that these  2 people because of their age would have  been denied  surgery and just told to wear a patch over one eye to alleviate the symptoms of double vision. Obviously cheaper than surgery.

 

I spent  two year  in the  US Navy during the Viet Nam war and was well treated by the military. There was tremendous  rationing of care and we were told specifically what things the military personnel and their dependents could have and which things they could not have. While I was in Viet Nam, my wife Nancy got sick  and got essentially no care at the Naval Hospital in Oakland, California. She went home and went to her family’s  private internist in Beverly Hills. While it was expensive, she received an immediate work up. Again rationing of care.

 

For those of you who are  over 65, this  bill in its present form might be lethal for you. People in Britain face rationing of care in that there is an eight month wait for cataract surgery, 11 for hernia and the same for disc and total hip The government wants to mimic the British  plan. For those of you younger, it will still mean restriction of the care that you and your children receive.

 

While 99% of physicians went into  medicine because of the love of  medicine and the  challenge of helping our fellow man, economics are still important. My rent goes up 2% each year and the salaries of my employees go up 2% each year. Twenty years ago, ophthalmologists were  paid $1800 for a cataract  surgery and today $500. This is a 73%  decrease in our  fees. I do not know of many jobs in America that have seen this sort of lowering of fees.

 

But there is more to the story than just the lower fees. When I came to Atlanta, there was a well known ophthalmologist that charged $2500 for a cataract surgery as he felt the was the best. He had a terrific reputation and in fact  I had my mother’s bilateral cataracts  operated on by him with a wonderful  result. She is now 94 and has 20/20 vision in both eyes. People would pay his  $2500 fee.

 

However, then the government came in and said that any doctor that  does  Medicare work cannot accept  more than the going rate ( now $500) or  he or she would be  severely fined. This put an end to his charging  $2500. The government said it was illegal to accept more than the government-allowed  rate. What  I am driving at is that those of you well off  will not  be able to go to the head of the line under this new  healthcare plan, just because you have money, as no physician will be  willing to go against the law to treat  you.

 

I am a pediatric ophthalmologist and trained for  10 years post-college to become a pediatric ophthalmologist (add  two years  of my service in the Navy and that comes  to 12 years).A neurosurgeon spends 14  years post -college, and if  he or she has to do the military that would be 16 years. I am not entitled to make what a neurosurgeon makes, but the new plan calls for all physicians to make the same amount of payment. I assure you that medical students will not go into neurosurgery and we will have a tremendous shortage of neurosurgeons. Already, the top neurosurgeon at my hospital who is in good health and only 52 years old has just quit because he can’t stand working with the government anymore. Forty-nine percent  of children under the age  of 16 in the state of Georgia are on Medicaid, so he felt he just could not stand working with the bureaucracy anymore.

 

We are being lied to about the  uninsured. They are getting care. I operate  at least 2  illegal immigrants each month who pay me nothing, and the children’s hospital at which I operate charges them nothing also.This is true not only on Atlanta, but of every community in America.

 

The bottom line is that I urge all of you to contact your congresswomen and congressmen and senators to defeat this bill. I promise you that you will not like rationing of your own health.

 

Furthermore, how can you trust a physician that works under these conditions knowing that he is controlled by the state. I certainly could not trust any doctor that  would work under these  draconian conditions.

 

One last thing: with this new healthcare plan there will be a tremendous shortage of physicians. It has been estimated that  approximately 5% of the current physician work force  will quit under this new  system. Also it is estimated that another 5% shortage will occur because of the decreased number of men and women wanting to go into medicine. At the present time the US government has  mandated gender equity in  admissions to medical schools .That means that  for the past  15 years  that  somewhere  between 49 and 51% of  each entering class are females. This is true of private schools also, because all private schools receive federal funding.

 

The average  career of a woman in medicine now is only 8-10 years and the average work week for a female in medicine is only 3-4 days. I have now trained 35  fellows in pediatric ophthalmology. Hands down the  best was  a female that I trained  4 years  ago — she  was head and  heels above all  others I have trained. She now  practices  only 3 days a week.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Cherryl Lewis says:

    I read your article with great interest. I’m 54, have had retinal detachments and scleral buckle surgery in both eyes. Because I first starting having these problems at a young age I found that my eye problems are all considered pre-existing conditions. The retinal detachment surgery was performed at Wills Eye Hospital by Dr. Gary Brown, and was completely paid for by the New Jersey State Commission for the Blind. I had two young children at the time and the commission helped me with all necessary rehabilitative services to finish college and become productive. I was economically productive for over 30 years, with my eye problems considered to be pre-existing conditions that I paid for out of my own pocket. Health insurance via my work as a corporate employee was a joke. Now I have cataracts, opthalmic migraines, occular hypertension, double vision, and visual disturbances. I worked through everything else but the cataracts, which are a show stopper. I also cannot use my health insurance to pay for surgery to remove the cataracts and get implants. Any reference to “eyes” denies my health insurance claims. I could have a brain tumor, and it will be denied because it affects my vision (eyes).

    Through no fault of my own I am now going through the SSDI, SSI, and Medicaid processes to get to a point where I can get any care at all. I will wait the two years out to get on Medicare before I get surgery. I will twiddle my thumbs and save a few hundred dollars a month from my blind pension in Missouri to afford the best implants possible when I can get the surgery on Medicare.

    What I support in Obama’s plans is that this pre-existing condition nonsense be resolved. If had been able to afford ongoing care for my eyesight then I’d be able to continue being a productive adult well into my late 60’s. As it stands now, I’m going to be “in the system”.

    I don’t have self-inflicted disabilities like drug addiction, smoking, poor diet, emotional issues, or poor decision-making abilities. But my productivity is cut short by a lack of coverage for a pre-existing condition that is absolutely correctable. Now I’m “in the system”.

    Some rationing of health care is expected. Why should an adult who chose to eat junk food and has cardiac problems get higher on the list than a child who’s sight can be saved now. I would like to see doctors more involved in the decion making process. I’d also like to see more attention paid to rehabilitative services. They bought me 30 years of productivity and I can personally vouch for their effectiveness.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s